Management and determination of hazardous occupational health and safety risks in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS)

Occupational health and safety risks in RAS systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14567014

Keywords:

Recirculating aquaculture, occupational health, occupational safety, risk analyzes

Abstract

Responding to the increasing demand for protein consumption globally, the aquaculture sector continues to grow exponentially every day. Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) are advanced technology systems that provide sustainable fish farming opportunities by ensuring the efficient use of water resources. In addition, ornamental aquarium fish farming is also intensively carried out in RAS. There is a need for manpower to meet the increasing workload in RAS as well as in offshore aquaculture facilities. However, the working environment in RAS also brings with it various occupational health and safety (OHS) risks. The main hazards affecting occupational safety in these systems can be listed as chemical substance use, biological risks, electrical hazards, physical ergonomic difficulties and psychosocial working conditions. The aim of this study is to determine the OHS risks encountered in the RAS environment in Türkiye, based on 3 different enterprises, and to evaluate solution strategies for these risks and methods for creating a safe working environment. In the study, 3 different RAS were examined (A, B, C) and as a result of our study, it was seen that the risk assessment, emergency planning and employee training criteria were fully met in RAS workplaces where occupational health and safety specialist services were provided. Accordingly, it was determined that risk scores decreased in businesses employing occupational safety specialists. In addition, the total percentage risk score was calculated and it was shown that the total percentage risk score was lower in RAS with occupational safety specialists compared to the others.

References

Alli, B. O. (2008). Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety Second edition. Geneva, International Labour Organization, 15, 2008.

Aydoğan, Ö. (2020). Su Ürünleri Sektöründe Karşılaşılan İş Hastalıkları ve Meslek Hastalıkları. Karaelmas Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 4(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.33720/kisgd.558324

de Oliveira, P. K., Cavalli, R. S., Kunert Filho, H. C., Carvalho, D., Benedetti, N., Rotta, M. A., ... & Cavalli, L. S. (2017). Occupational health and safety in aquaculture: insights on Brazilian public policies. Journal of agromedicine, 22(2), 148-158.

Ercan, P., & Mert, B. Su ürünleri sektöründe iş güvenliği. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 7(4), 15-27.

Heinen, J. M., Hankins, J. A., Weber, A. L., & Watten, B. J. (1996). A semiclosed recirculating-water system for high-density culture of rainbow trout. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 58(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1996)058<0011:ASRWSF>2.3.CO;2

ILO. (2021). Statistics on Safety and Health at Work.: https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/safety-and-health-at-work

Khalilzadeh, M., Ghasemi, P., Afrasiabi, A., & Shakeri, H. (2021). Hybrid fuzzy MCDM and FMEA integrating with linear programming approach for the health and safety executive risks: a case study. Journal of Modelling in Management, 16(4), 1025-1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2019-0285

Kurtar, G. K. (2011). Türkiye su ürünleri yetiştiricilik sektöründe iş sağlığı ve güvenliği mevzuatı (Doctoral dissertation, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Su Ürünleri Yetiştiricilik Anabilim Dalı, Adana).

Köken, S., Ceyhan, T., & Tosunoğlu, Z. (2019). Dalyan balıkçılığının iş sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ege Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2019.36.2.09

Lower, T. (2015). Mapping work health and safety risks in the primary industries. RIRDC.

Minaz, M., Ak, K., & Kurtoğlu, İ. Z. (2021). Occupational health and safety risk analysis in trout aquaculture facility. OHS ACADEMY, 4(3), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.38213/ohsacademy.989585

Minaz, M. (2024). Assessment of Occupational Health and Safety for Marine Cage Culture: L-type Matrix Risk Analysis. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 24(12). https://doi.org/10.4194/TRJFAS26642

Mitchell, R. J., & Lystad, R. P. (2019). Occupational injury and disease in the Australian aquaculture industry. Marine Policy, 99, 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.044

Moreau, D. T., & Neis, B. (2009). Occupational health and safety hazards in Atlantic Canadian aquaculture: Laying the groundwork for prevention. Marine Policy, 33(2), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.09.001

Murray, F., Bostock, J. & Fletcher, D. (2014) Review of recirculation aquaculture system technologies and their commercial application. Highlands and Islands Enterprise, Final Report March 2014. University of Stirling Aquaculture. http://www.hie.co.uk/common/handlers/download-document.ashx?id=236008c4-f52a-48d9-9084-54e89e965573

Myers, M. L., & Durborow, R. M. (2012). Aquacultural safety and health (Vol. 2012, pp. 385-400). London, England: IntechOpen.

Ngajilo, D., & Jeebhay, M. F. (2019). Occupational injuries and diseases in aquaculture–a review of literature. Aquaculture, 507, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.03.053

Özkiliç, Ö. (2005). İş sağliği ve güvenliği, yönetim sistemleri ve risk değerlendirme metodolojileri. TİSK Yayınları, Ankara, 336.

Resmi Gazete, 28339 (2012). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/06/20120630-1.htm

Resmi Gazete, 29992 (2017). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/02/20170227M1-1-1.pdf

Sabuncu, H. (2005). İşyerlerinde Birincil Sağlık Hizmetleri. Legal İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Dergisi, 2(7), 1082-1098.

Secretariat, I. (2022). International Year of Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022–Global Developments. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter, (65), 9-10.

Soares, M. S., Singh, R., Kumar, S., Jha, R., Nedoma, J., Martinek, R., & Marques, C. (2024). The role of smart optical biosensors and devices on predictive analytics for the future of aquaculture systems. Optics & Laser Technology, 177, 111049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111049

Soykan, O. (2023). Occupational health and safety in the Turkish fisheries and aquaculture; a statistical evaluation on a neglected industry. Safety and Health at Work, 14(3), 295-302.

Steinfeld, H., & Wassenaar, T. (2007). The role of livestock production in carbon and nitrogen cycles. Annual Reviews in Environmental Resources, 32(1), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041806.143508

Tatar, V., & Özer, M. R. A. M. B. (2019). Balikçilik sektörünün iş sağliği ve güvenliği yönünden değerlendirilmesi. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 74(74), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.13881

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

KARGA, M. (2024). Management and determination of hazardous occupational health and safety risks in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS): Occupational health and safety risks in RAS systems. MARINE REPORTS (MAREP), 3(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14567014

Issue

Section

Research Article